Conduit vs irssi
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Conduit
Simple, fast and reliable Matrix homeserver in Rust
VS
irssi
Modular terminal IRC client with scripting
| Feature | Conduit | irssi |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Matrix & XMPP | Chat & Communication |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-2.0 |
| Language | Rust | C |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 32 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary, source | bare-metal, binary, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 2,200 | ★ 3,129 |
| First released | 2020 | 1999 |
| Replaces | Slack, Discord | Slack |
Why pick each one
Choose irssi if…
- Released under the GPL-2.0 license
- Active community (3.1k GitHub stars)
- Written in C
- Tiny footprint — runs in 32 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Conduit or irssi better?
Neither is universally better. irssi has the larger community, while Conduit is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Conduit and irssi free and open-source?
Yes. Conduit is licensed under Apache-2.0 and irssi under GPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Conduit and irssi with Docker?
Conduit: yes. irssi: check the project docs for container support.