CompreFace vs Motion
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted video surveillance options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
CompreFace
Self-hosted face recognition service with REST API
VS
Motion
Lightweight motion-detection video surveillance daemon
| Feature | CompreFace | Motion |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Video Surveillance | Video Surveillance |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-2.0 |
| Language | Java | C++ |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 4,096 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | docker | docker, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 8,173 | ★ 4,030 |
| First released | 2020 | 2000 |
| Replaces | Amazon Rekognition | Nest Cam |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is CompreFace or Motion better?
Neither is universally better. CompreFace has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are CompreFace and Motion free and open-source?
Yes. CompreFace is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Motion under GPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run CompreFace and Motion with Docker?
CompreFace: yes. Motion: yes.