Toxic vs Mumble

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted chat & communication options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureToxicMumble
CategoryChat & CommunicationChat & Communication
LicenseGPL-3.0BSD-3-Clause
LanguageCC++
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM64 MB128 MB
Deploymentbare-metal, sourcedocker, bare-metal, binary
GitHub stars★ 1,301★ 8,175
First released20142005
ReplacesSkype, WhatsAppDiscord, TeamSpeak, Ventrilo

Why pick each one

Choose Toxic if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • Active community (1.3k GitHub stars)
  • Written in C
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 64 MB RAM
Toxic details

Choose Mumble if…

  • Excellent voice quality
  • Tiny resource footprint
Mumble details

Frequently asked questions

Is Toxic or Mumble better?

Mumble is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Toxic if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are Toxic and Mumble free and open-source?

Yes. Toxic is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Mumble under BSD-3-Clause. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Toxic and Mumble with Docker?

Toxic: check the project docs for container support. Mumble: yes.

Related comparisons