Toxic vs Etherpad

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted chat & communication options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureToxicEtherpad
CategoryChat & CommunicationChat & Communication
LicenseGPL-3.0Apache-2.0
LanguageCTypeScript
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM64 MB512 MB
Deploymentbare-metal, sourcedocker, bare-metal, source
GitHub stars★ 1,301★ 18,481
First released20142011
ReplacesSkype, WhatsAppGoogle Docs

Why pick each one

Choose Toxic if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • Active community (1.3k GitHub stars)
  • Written in C
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 64 MB RAM
Toxic details

Choose Etherpad if…

  • Very mature and stable
  • Highly extensible
Etherpad details

Frequently asked questions

Is Toxic or Etherpad better?

Neither is universally better. Etherpad has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Toxic and Etherpad free and open-source?

Yes. Toxic is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Etherpad under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Toxic and Etherpad with Docker?

Toxic: check the project docs for container support. Etherpad: yes.

Related comparisons