Metronome IM vs Dendrite
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted matrix & xmpp options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Metronome IM
Lightweight, fork-based XMPP communication server
VS
Dendrite
Second-generation Matrix homeserver written in Go
| Feature | Metronome IM | Dendrite |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Matrix & XMPP | Matrix & XMPP |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | Lua | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal, source | docker, binary, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 175 | ★ 5,632 |
| First released | 2012 | 2017 |
| Replaces | Slack, WhatsApp | Slack, Discord |
Why pick each one
Choose Metronome IM if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in Lua
- Tiny footprint — runs in 128 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Metronome IM or Dendrite better?
Neither is universally better. Dendrite has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Metronome IM and Dendrite free and open-source?
Yes. Metronome IM is licensed under MIT and Dendrite under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Metronome IM and Dendrite with Docker?
Metronome IM: yes. Dendrite: yes.