Commento vs Scoold
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted forums & community options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Commento
Privacy-friendly embeddable discussion widget
VS
Scoold
Self-hosted Q&A platform and Stack Overflow alternative
| Feature | Commento | Scoold |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Forums & Community | Forums & Community |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | Go | Java |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 1,024 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary | docker, bare-metal, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 3,781 | ★ 920 |
| First released | 2017 | 2014 |
| Replaces | Disqus, Facebook Comments | Stack Overflow |
Why pick each one
Choose Commento if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (3.8k GitHub stars)
Choose Scoold if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in Java
Frequently asked questions
Is Commento or Scoold better?
Commento is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Scoold if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Commento and Scoold free and open-source?
Yes. Commento is licensed under MIT and Scoold under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Commento and Scoold with Docker?
Commento: yes. Scoold: yes.