Commento vs django-machina
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted forums & community options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Commento
Privacy-friendly embeddable discussion widget
VS
django-machina
Forum engine for Django applications
| Feature | Commento | django-machina |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Forums & Community | Forums & Community |
| License | MIT | BSD-3-Clause |
| Language | Go | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary | source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 3,781 | ★ 604 |
| First released | 2017 | 2016 |
| Replaces | Disqus, Facebook Comments | phpBB |
Why pick each one
Choose Commento if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (3.8k GitHub stars)
Choose django-machina if…
- Released under the BSD-3-Clause license
- Written in Python
- Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Commento or django-machina better?
Commento is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider django-machina if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Commento and django-machina free and open-source?
Yes. Commento is licensed under MIT and django-machina under BSD-3-Clause. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Commento and django-machina with Docker?
Commento: yes. django-machina: check the project docs for container support.