Cluster Control vs dive

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted developer tools & git options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureCluster Controldive
CategoryDeveloper Tools & GitDeveloper Tools & Git
License⊘ ProprietaryMIT
LanguagedebGo
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM512 MB128 MB
Deploymentdockerbinary, docker
GitHub stars★ 54,426
First released20202018
ReplacesDocker Desktop

Why pick each one

Choose Cluster Control if…

  • Released under the ⊘ Proprietary license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Written in deb
  • Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Cluster Control details

Choose dive if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 54.4k GitHub stars
dive details

Frequently asked questions

Is Cluster Control or dive better?

dive is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Cluster Control if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are Cluster Control and dive free and open-source?

Yes. Cluster Control is licensed under ⊘ Proprietary and dive under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Cluster Control and dive with Docker?

Cluster Control: yes. dive: yes.

Related comparisons