CloudBeaver vs lazydocker

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted developer tools & git options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureCloudBeaverlazydocker
CategoryDeveloper Tools & GitDeveloper Tools & Git
LicenseApache-2.0MIT
LanguageTypeScriptGo
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM1,024 MB64 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metalbinary, source
GitHub stars★ 5,073★ 52,348
First released20202019
ReplacesphpMyAdmin, DataGripDocker Desktop

Why pick each one

Choose CloudBeaver if…

  • Supports many databases
  • Powerful editor
CloudBeaver details

Choose lazydocker if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Mature project with 52.3k GitHub stars
  • Written in Go
lazydocker details

Frequently asked questions

Is CloudBeaver or lazydocker better?

lazydocker is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider CloudBeaver if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are CloudBeaver and lazydocker free and open-source?

Yes. CloudBeaver is licensed under Apache-2.0 and lazydocker under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run CloudBeaver and lazydocker with Docker?

CloudBeaver: yes. lazydocker: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons