Claroline Connect vs Tsugi
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted learning & courses options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Claroline Connect
Open-source LMS for collaborative online courses
VS
Tsugi
Framework for building LTI learning tools
| Feature | Claroline Connect | Tsugi |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Learning & Courses | Learning & Courses |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | PHP | PHP |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 1,024 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal, source | bare-metal, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 349 | ★ 371 |
| First released | 2002 | 2014 |
| Replaces | Moodle, Blackboard | LTI Marketplace tools |
Why pick each one
Choose Claroline Connect if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- Written in PHP
Choose Tsugi if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- Written in PHP
- Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Claroline Connect or Tsugi better?
Neither is universally better. Tsugi has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Claroline Connect and Tsugi free and open-source?
Yes. Claroline Connect is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Tsugi under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Claroline Connect and Tsugi with Docker?
Claroline Connect: check the project docs for container support. Tsugi: check the project docs for container support.