ChronoFrame vs Photonix
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted photo management options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
ChronoFrame
Personal gallery application with online photo management, supporting
VS
Photonix
Self-hosted photo gallery with face and location detection
| Feature | ChronoFrame | Photonix |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Photo Management | Photo Management |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | Vue | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 2,048 MB |
| Deployment | docker | docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 1,894 | ★ 1,954 |
| First released | 2026 | 2019 |
| Replaces | — | Google Photos |
Why pick each one
Choose ChronoFrame if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (1.9k GitHub stars)
- Written in Vue
Frequently asked questions
Is ChronoFrame or Photonix better?
Neither is universally better. Photonix has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are ChronoFrame and Photonix free and open-source?
Yes. ChronoFrame is licensed under MIT and Photonix under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run ChronoFrame and Photonix with Docker?
ChronoFrame: yes. Photonix: yes.