ChannelTube vs PeerTube

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted media servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureChannelTubePeerTube
CategoryMedia ServersMedia Servers
LicenseAGPL-3.0AGPL-3.0
LanguagePythonTypeScript
Setup difficultyMediumHard
Min. RAM512 MB2,048 MB
Deploymentdockerdocker, bare-metal
GitHub stars★ 324★ 15,236
First released20262018
ReplacesYouTube, Vimeo

Why pick each one

Choose ChannelTube if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Written in Python
  • Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
ChannelTube details

Choose PeerTube if…

  • Reduces bandwidth via P2P
  • Federates with the Fediverse
PeerTube details

Frequently asked questions

Is ChannelTube or PeerTube better?

Neither is universally better. PeerTube has the larger community, while ChannelTube is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are ChannelTube and PeerTube free and open-source?

Yes. ChannelTube is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and PeerTube under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run ChannelTube and PeerTube with Docker?

ChannelTube: yes. PeerTube: yes.

Related comparisons