Centrifugo vs Nextcloud Talk Signaling Server
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted chat & communication options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Centrifugo
Scalable real-time messaging server for apps and websites
VS
Nextcloud Talk Signaling Server
Scalable signaling backend for Nextcloud Talk
| Feature | Centrifugo | Nextcloud Talk Signaling Server |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Chat & Communication | Chat & Communication |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | Go | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Hard |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, kubernetes, binary | docker, binary, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 10,590 | ★ 522 |
| First released | 2015 | 2017 |
| Replaces | Pusher, Firebase Realtime Database | Zoom |
Why pick each one
Choose Nextcloud Talk Signaling Server if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in Go
- Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Centrifugo or Nextcloud Talk Signaling Server better?
Centrifugo is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler medium setup. Consider Nextcloud Talk Signaling Server if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Centrifugo and Nextcloud Talk Signaling Server free and open-source?
Yes. Centrifugo is licensed under MIT and Nextcloud Talk Signaling Server under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Centrifugo and Nextcloud Talk Signaling Server with Docker?
Centrifugo: yes. Nextcloud Talk Signaling Server: yes.