Centrifugo vs Mlmmj Web
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted chat & communication options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Centrifugo
Scalable real-time messaging server for apps and websites
VS
Mlmmj Web
Simple web frontend for Mlmmj mailing list management
| Feature | Centrifugo | Mlmmj Web |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Chat & Communication | Chat & Communication |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | Go | JavaScript |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 50 MB |
| Deployment | docker, kubernetes, binary | bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 10,590 | — |
| First released | 2015 | 2024 |
| Replaces | Pusher, Firebase Realtime Database | — |
Why pick each one
Choose Mlmmj Web if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Written in JavaScript
- Tiny footprint — runs in 50 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Centrifugo or Mlmmj Web better?
Neither is universally better. Centrifugo has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Centrifugo and Mlmmj Web free and open-source?
Yes. Centrifugo is licensed under MIT and Mlmmj Web under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Centrifugo and Mlmmj Web with Docker?
Centrifugo: yes. Mlmmj Web: check the project docs for container support.