Centrifugo vs mautrix-telegram
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted chat & communication options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Centrifugo
Scalable real-time messaging server for apps and websites
VS
mautrix-telegram
Matrix-Telegram puppeting bridge
| Feature | Centrifugo | mautrix-telegram |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Chat & Communication | Chat & Communication |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | Go | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | docker, kubernetes, binary | docker, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 10,590 | ★ 1,715 |
| First released | 2015 | 2018 |
| Replaces | Pusher, Firebase Realtime Database | Telegram official client |
Why pick each one
Choose mautrix-telegram if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (1.7k GitHub stars)
- Written in Go
Frequently asked questions
Is Centrifugo or mautrix-telegram better?
Neither is universally better. Centrifugo has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Centrifugo and mautrix-telegram free and open-source?
Yes. Centrifugo is licensed under MIT and mautrix-telegram under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Centrifugo and mautrix-telegram with Docker?
Centrifugo: yes. mautrix-telegram: yes.