Centrifugo vs matrix-commander
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted chat & communication options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Centrifugo
Scalable real-time messaging server for apps and websites
VS
matrix-commander
Command-line tool for sending and receiving Matrix messages
| Feature | Centrifugo | matrix-commander |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Chat & Communication | Chat & Communication |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | Go | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | docker, kubernetes, binary | source, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 10,590 | ★ 745 |
| First released | 2015 | 2020 |
| Replaces | Pusher, Firebase Realtime Database | Slack CLI |
Why pick each one
Choose matrix-commander if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Written in Python
- Tiny footprint — runs in 64 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Centrifugo or matrix-commander better?
Neither is universally better. Centrifugo has the larger community, while matrix-commander is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Centrifugo and matrix-commander free and open-source?
Yes. Centrifugo is licensed under MIT and matrix-commander under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Centrifugo and matrix-commander with Docker?
Centrifugo: yes. matrix-commander: check the project docs for container support.