Centrifugo vs FusionPBX
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted chat & communication options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Centrifugo
Scalable real-time messaging server for apps and websites
VS
FusionPBX
Multi-tenant web GUI for FreeSWITCH
| Feature | Centrifugo | FusionPBX |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Chat & Communication | Chat & Communication |
| License | MIT | MPL-1.1 |
| Language | Go | PHP |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Hard |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 1,024 MB |
| Deployment | docker, kubernetes, binary | bare-metal, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 10,590 | ★ 1,038 |
| First released | 2015 | 2013 |
| Replaces | Pusher, Firebase Realtime Database | 3CX, RingCentral |
Why pick each one
Choose FusionPBX if…
- Released under the MPL-1.1 license
- Active community (1k GitHub stars)
- Written in PHP
Frequently asked questions
Is Centrifugo or FusionPBX better?
Centrifugo is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler medium setup. Consider FusionPBX if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Centrifugo and FusionPBX free and open-source?
Yes. Centrifugo is licensed under MIT and FusionPBX under MPL-1.1. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Centrifugo and FusionPBX with Docker?
Centrifugo: yes. FusionPBX: check the project docs for container support.