Centrifugo vs Cusdis
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted chat & communication options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Centrifugo
Scalable real-time messaging server for apps and websites
VS
Cusdis
Lightweight, privacy-friendly embeddable comment system
| Feature | Centrifugo | Cusdis |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Chat & Communication | Chat & Communication |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | Go | TypeScript |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | docker, kubernetes, binary | docker, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 10,590 | ★ 2,785 |
| First released | 2015 | 2021 |
| Replaces | Pusher, Firebase Realtime Database | Disqus |
Why pick each one
Choose Cusdis if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (2.8k GitHub stars)
Frequently asked questions
Is Centrifugo or Cusdis better?
Neither is universally better. Centrifugo has the larger community, while Cusdis is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Centrifugo and Cusdis free and open-source?
Yes. Centrifugo is licensed under MIT and Cusdis under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Centrifugo and Cusdis with Docker?
Centrifugo: yes. Cusdis: yes.