CapRover vs PocketBase

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted self-hosting platforms (paas) options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureCapRoverPocketBase
CategorySelf-Hosting Platforms (PaaS)Self-Hosting Platforms (PaaS)
LicenseApache-2.0MIT
LanguageTypeScriptGo
Setup difficultyEasyEasy
Min. RAM1,024 MB64 MB
Deploymentdocker, one-clickbinary, docker, source
GitHub stars★ 15,123★ 60,550
First released20172022
ReplacesHerokuFirebase

Why pick each one

Choose CapRover if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • One-click install on common self-host platforms
CapRover details

Choose PocketBase if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 60.5k GitHub stars
PocketBase details

Frequently asked questions

Is CapRover or PocketBase better?

Neither is universally better. PocketBase has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are CapRover and PocketBase free and open-source?

Yes. CapRover is licensed under Apache-2.0 and PocketBase under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run CapRover and PocketBase with Docker?

CapRover: yes. PocketBase: yes.

Related comparisons