Candy vs Typebot
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted chat & communication options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Candy
JavaScript-based multi-user XMPP chat client
VS
Typebot
Conversational app builder (alternative to Typeform and Landbot)
| Feature | Candy | Typebot |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Chat & Communication | Chat & Communication |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | JavaScript | TypeScript |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 32 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal, source | docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 1,314 | ★ 10,248 |
| First released | 2011 | 2026 |
| Replaces | Chatango | — |
Why pick each one
Choose Candy if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Active community (1.3k GitHub stars)
- Written in JavaScript
Choose Typebot if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 10.2k GitHub stars
- Written in TypeScript
Frequently asked questions
Is Candy or Typebot better?
Neither is universally better. Typebot has the larger community, while Candy is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Candy and Typebot free and open-source?
Yes. Candy is licensed under MIT and Typebot under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Candy and Typebot with Docker?
Candy: check the project docs for container support. Typebot: yes.