Cameradar vs zmNinja
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted video surveillance options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Cameradar
RTSP stream discovery and access-auditing tool for cameras
VS
zmNinja
Cross-platform mobile and desktop client for ZoneMinder
| Feature | Cameradar | zmNinja |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Video Surveillance | Video Surveillance |
| License | MIT | GPL-2.0 |
| Language | Go | JavaScript |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary, source | binary, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 5,147 | ★ 1,080 |
| First released | 2016 | 2015 |
| Replaces | Commercial camera audit tools | Commercial CCTV apps |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Cameradar or zmNinja better?
Neither is universally better. Cameradar has the larger community, while zmNinja is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Cameradar and zmNinja free and open-source?
Yes. Cameradar is licensed under MIT and zmNinja under GPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Cameradar and zmNinja with Docker?
Cameradar: yes. zmNinja: check the project docs for container support.