Cameradar vs SentryShot
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted video surveillance options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Cameradar
RTSP stream discovery and access-auditing tool for cameras
VS
SentryShot
Video surveillance management system
| Feature | Cameradar | SentryShot |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Video Surveillance | Video Surveillance |
| License | MIT | GPL-2.0 |
| Language | Go | Docker |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary, source | docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 5,147 | — |
| First released | 2016 | 2020 |
| Replaces | Commercial camera audit tools | — |
Why pick each one
Choose SentryShot if…
- Released under the GPL-2.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in Docker
- Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Cameradar or SentryShot better?
Neither is universally better. Cameradar has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Cameradar and SentryShot free and open-source?
Yes. Cameradar is licensed under MIT and SentryShot under GPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Cameradar and SentryShot with Docker?
Cameradar: yes. SentryShot: yes.