cAdvisor vs SigNoz

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeaturecAdvisorSigNoz
CategoryMonitoring & StatusDeveloper Tools & Git
LicenseApache-2.0MIT
LanguageGoTypeScript
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM64 MB4,096 MB
Deploymentdocker, kubernetes, binarydocker, kubernetes, helm
GitHub stars★ 19,342★ 31,790
First released20142021
ReplacesDatadogDatadog, New Relic

Why pick each one

Choose cAdvisor if…

  • Zero configuration
  • Lightweight
cAdvisor details

Choose SigNoz if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Mature project with 31.8k GitHub stars
SigNoz details

Frequently asked questions

Is cAdvisor or SigNoz better?

Neither is universally better. SigNoz has the larger community, while cAdvisor is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are cAdvisor and SigNoz free and open-source?

Yes. cAdvisor is licensed under Apache-2.0 and SigNoz under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run cAdvisor and SigNoz with Docker?

cAdvisor: yes. SigNoz: yes.

Related comparisons