Cactus Comments vs The Lounge

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted chat & communication options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureCactus CommentsThe Lounge
CategoryChat & CommunicationChat & Communication
LicenseMITMIT
LanguageElixirTypeScript
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM256 MB256 MB
Deploymentdocker, sourcedocker, binary, source
GitHub stars★ 200★ 6,309
First released20202014
ReplacesDisqusIRCCloud, Slack

Why pick each one

Choose Cactus Comments if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Written in Elixir
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Cactus Comments details

Choose The Lounge if…

  • Great IRC experience in the browser
  • Multi-user support
The Lounge details

Frequently asked questions

Is Cactus Comments or The Lounge better?

The Lounge is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Cactus Comments if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are Cactus Comments and The Lounge free and open-source?

Yes. Cactus Comments is licensed under MIT and The Lounge under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Cactus Comments and The Lounge with Docker?

Cactus Comments: yes. The Lounge: yes.

Related comparisons