Burp vs Velero
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted backup & recovery options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Burp
Network backup and restore program for Unix and Windows
VS
Velero
Backup and migrate Kubernetes cluster resources
| Feature | Burp | Velero |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Backup & Recovery | Backup & Recovery |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | C | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Hard |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal | kubernetes, helm |
| GitHub stars | ★ 504 | ★ 10,187 |
| First released | 2011 | 2017 |
| Replaces | CrashPlan | Kasten K10 |
Why pick each one
Choose Burp if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
- Written in C
- Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Choose Velero if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
- Mature project with 10.2k GitHub stars
- Written in Go
Frequently asked questions
Is Burp or Velero better?
Neither is universally better. Velero has the larger community; both share a hard setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Burp and Velero free and open-source?
Yes. Burp is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Velero under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Burp and Velero with Docker?
Burp: check the project docs for container support. Velero: check the project docs for container support.