Burp vs Bupstash
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted backup & recovery options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Burp
Network backup and restore program for Unix and Windows
VS
Bupstash
Easy and efficient encrypted backups
| Feature | Burp | Bupstash |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Backup & Recovery | Backup & Recovery |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Language | C | Rust |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal | binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 504 | ★ 924 |
| First released | 2011 | 2020 |
| Replaces | CrashPlan | Backblaze, CrashPlan |
Why pick each one
Choose Burp if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
- Written in C
- Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Choose Bupstash if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Written in Rust
- Tiny footprint — runs in 128 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Burp or Bupstash better?
Bupstash is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler medium setup. Consider Burp if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Burp and Bupstash free and open-source?
Yes. Burp is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Bupstash under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Burp and Bupstash with Docker?
Burp: check the project docs for container support. Bupstash: check the project docs for container support.