Burp vs CKAN

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted backup & recovery options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureBurpCKAN
CategoryBackup & RecoveryBackup & Recovery
LicenseAGPL-3.0AGPL-3.0
LanguageCPython
Setup difficultyHardMedium
Min. RAM256 MB512 MB
Deploymentbare-metalbare-metal
GitHub stars★ 504★ 5,088
First released20112026
ReplacesCrashPlan

Why pick each one

Choose Burp if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • Written in C
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Burp details

Choose CKAN if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • Mature project with 5.1k GitHub stars
  • Written in Python
  • Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
CKAN details

Frequently asked questions

Is Burp or CKAN better?

CKAN is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler medium setup. Consider Burp if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are Burp and CKAN free and open-source?

Yes. Burp is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and CKAN under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Burp and CKAN with Docker?

Burp: check the project docs for container support. CKAN: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons