Budibase vs Kestra
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted automation & workflows options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Budibase
Low-code platform to build internal tools and automations
VS
Kestra
Declarative orchestration and scheduling platform
| Feature | Budibase | Kestra |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Automation & Workflows | Automation & Workflows |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | TypeScript | Java |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Hard |
| Min. RAM | 2,048 MB | 1,024 MB |
| Deployment | docker, kubernetes, helm | docker, kubernetes |
| GitHub stars | ★ 28,190 | ★ 27,575 |
| First released | 2019 | 2021 |
| Replaces | Microsoft Power Apps, Retool, Airtable | Zapier, Make |
Why pick each one
Choose Kestra if…
- Strong for data orchestration
- Scalable architecture
- Open-source license
Frequently asked questions
Is Budibase or Kestra better?
Budibase is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler medium setup. Consider Kestra if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Budibase and Kestra free and open-source?
Yes. Budibase is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Kestra under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Budibase and Kestra with Docker?
Budibase: yes. Kestra: yes.