BuddyPress vs diaspora*

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted social networks options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureBuddyPressdiaspora*
CategorySocial NetworksSocial Networks
LicenseGPL-2.0AGPL-3.0
LanguagePHPRuby
Setup difficultyMediumHard
Min. RAM512 MB1,024 MB
Deploymentbare-metal, sourcedocker, bare-metal, source
GitHub stars★ 250★ 13,656
First released20092010
ReplacesNing, Mighty NetworksFacebook, Twitter

Why pick each one

Choose BuddyPress if…

  • Released under the GPL-2.0 license
  • Written in PHP
  • Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
BuddyPress details

Choose diaspora* if…

  • Strong privacy ethos
  • Established network
diaspora* details

Frequently asked questions

Is BuddyPress or diaspora* better?

Neither is universally better. diaspora* has the larger community, while BuddyPress is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are BuddyPress and diaspora* free and open-source?

Yes. BuddyPress is licensed under GPL-2.0 and diaspora* under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run BuddyPress and diaspora* with Docker?

BuddyPress: check the project docs for container support. diaspora*: yes.

Related comparisons