Bolt vs Ghost
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted content management systems options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Bolt
Lightweight and simple CMS built on Symfony
VS
Ghost
Professional publishing platform for blogs and newsletters
| Feature | Bolt | Ghost |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Content Management Systems | Content Management Systems |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | PHP | JavaScript |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 1,024 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal, source, docker | docker, bare-metal, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 590 | ★ 54,707 |
| First released | 2012 | 2013 |
| Replaces | WordPress, Contentful | WordPress, Substack, Medium |
Why pick each one
Choose Bolt if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in PHP
- Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Choose Ghost if…
- Excellent for newsletters and memberships
- Clean, fast publishing experience
Frequently asked questions
Is Bolt or Ghost better?
Neither is universally better. Ghost has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Bolt and Ghost free and open-source?
Yes. Bolt is licensed under MIT and Ghost under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Bolt and Ghost with Docker?
Bolt: yes. Ghost: yes.