blogc vs Zola
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted blogging platforms options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
blogc
Compiler for static blogs and websites written in C
VS
Zola
Fast static site engine in a single binary
| Feature | blogc | Zola |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Blogging Platforms | Blogging Platforms |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | MIT |
| Language | C | Rust |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 32 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal, source | binary, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 192 | ★ 17,308 |
| First released | 2015 | 2017 |
| Replaces | Jekyll, Hugo | WordPress, Medium |
Why pick each one
Choose blogc if…
- Released under the BSD-3-Clause license
- Written in C
- Tiny footprint — runs in 32 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is blogc or Zola better?
Neither is universally better. Zola has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are blogc and Zola free and open-source?
Yes. blogc is licensed under BSD-3-Clause and Zola under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run blogc and Zola with Docker?
blogc: check the project docs for container support. Zola: check the project docs for container support.