Black Candy vs PeerTube

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted media servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureBlack CandyPeerTube
CategoryMedia ServersMedia Servers
LicenseMITAGPL-3.0
LanguageRubyTypeScript
Setup difficultyMediumHard
Min. RAM512 MB2,048 MB
Deploymentdockerdocker, bare-metal
GitHub stars★ 4,337★ 15,236
First released20262018
ReplacesYouTube, Vimeo

Why pick each one

Choose Black Candy if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (4.3k GitHub stars)
  • Written in Ruby
Black Candy details

Choose PeerTube if…

  • Reduces bandwidth via P2P
  • Federates with the Fediverse
PeerTube details

Frequently asked questions

Is Black Candy or PeerTube better?

Neither is universally better. PeerTube has the larger community, while Black Candy is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Black Candy and PeerTube free and open-source?

Yes. Black Candy is licensed under MIT and PeerTube under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Black Candy and PeerTube with Docker?

Black Candy: yes. PeerTube: yes.

Related comparisons