bitmagnet vs mydumper

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted backup & recovery options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
Featurebitmagnetmydumper
CategoryBackup & RecoveryBackup & Recovery
LicenseMITGPL-3.0
LanguageGoC
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM512 MB128 MB
Deploymentdockerbinary, bare-metal
GitHub stars★ 4,265★ 3,208
First released20262009
Replacesmysqldump

Why pick each one

Choose bitmagnet if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (4.3k GitHub stars)
  • Written in Go
bitmagnet details

Choose mydumper if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • Active community (3.2k GitHub stars)
  • Written in C
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 128 MB RAM
mydumper details

Frequently asked questions

Is bitmagnet or mydumper better?

Neither is universally better. bitmagnet has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are bitmagnet and mydumper free and open-source?

Yes. bitmagnet is licensed under MIT and mydumper under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run bitmagnet and mydumper with Docker?

bitmagnet: yes. mydumper: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons