Beszel vs Pulse Monitor

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureBeszelPulse Monitor
CategoryMonitoring & StatusMonitoring & Status
LicenseMITMIT
LanguageGoGo
Setup difficultyEasyEasy
Min. RAM128 MB256 MB
Deploymentdocker, binarydocker
GitHub stars★ 24,108★ 6,509
First released20242024
ReplacesUptimeRobotDatadog

Why pick each one

Choose Beszel if…

  • Extremely lightweight
  • Simple multi-host view
  • Easy setup
Beszel details

Choose Pulse Monitor if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 6.5k GitHub stars
Pulse Monitor details

Frequently asked questions

Is Beszel or Pulse Monitor better?

Neither is universally better. Beszel has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Beszel and Pulse Monitor free and open-source?

Yes. Beszel is licensed under MIT and Pulse Monitor under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Beszel and Pulse Monitor with Docker?

Beszel: yes. Pulse Monitor: yes.

Related comparisons