SHSelfHostIndex

BentoPDF vs SeedDMS

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted document management options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
BE BentoPDF Powerful, privacy-first, client-side PDF toolkit that allows you to VS SE SeedDMS Easy-to-use web-based document management system
FeatureBentoPDFSeedDMS
CategoryDocument ManagementDocument Management
LicenseAGPL-3.0GPL-2.0
LanguageJavaScriptPHP
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM512 MB512 MB
Deploymentdockerdocker, bare-metal, source
GitHub stars★ 14,551★ 200
First released20262010
Replaces—SharePoint, M-Files

Why pick each one

Choose BentoPDF if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 14.6k GitHub stars
  • Written in JavaScript
BentoPDF details

Choose SeedDMS if…

  • Quick to deploy
  • Approachable interface
SeedDMS details

Frequently asked questions

Is BentoPDF or SeedDMS better?

Neither is universally better. BentoPDF has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are BentoPDF and SeedDMS free and open-source?

Yes. BentoPDF is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and SeedDMS under GPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run BentoPDF and SeedDMS with Docker?

BentoPDF: yes. SeedDMS: yes.

Related comparisons