SHSelfHostIndex

BentoPDF vs PDFKeeper

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted document management options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
BE BentoPDF Powerful, privacy-first, client-side PDF toolkit that allows you to VS PD PDFKeeper Open-source PDF document management system
FeatureBentoPDFPDFKeeper
CategoryDocument ManagementDocument Management
LicenseAGPL-3.0GPL-3.0
LanguageJavaScriptC#
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM512 MB512 MB
Deploymentdockerbare-metal, source
GitHub stars★ 14,551★ 228
First released20262014
Replaces—DEVONthink, Mayan EDMS

Why pick each one

Choose BentoPDF if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 14.6k GitHub stars
  • Written in JavaScript
BentoPDF details

Choose PDFKeeper if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • Written in C#
  • Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
PDFKeeper details

Frequently asked questions

Is BentoPDF or PDFKeeper better?

Neither is universally better. BentoPDF has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are BentoPDF and PDFKeeper free and open-source?

Yes. BentoPDF is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and PDFKeeper under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run BentoPDF and PDFKeeper with Docker?

BentoPDF: yes. PDFKeeper: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons