Beehive vs FlowForge Lite
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted automation & workflows options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Beehive
Event and agent system for connecting things
VS
FlowForge Lite
Visual flow-based automation for connecting devices and APIs
| Feature | Beehive | FlowForge Lite |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Automation & Workflows | Automation & Workflows |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | Go | JavaScript |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary | docker, bare-metal, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 6,485 | ★ 395 |
| First released | 2015 | 2021 |
| Replaces | IFTTT | Zapier, IFTTT |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Beehive or FlowForge Lite better?
Neither is universally better. Beehive has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Beehive and FlowForge Lite free and open-source?
Yes. Beehive is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and FlowForge Lite under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Beehive and FlowForge Lite with Docker?
Beehive: yes. FlowForge Lite: yes.