AutoBD vs Reveal.js
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted office suites options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
| Feature | AutoBD | Reveal.js |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Office Suites | Office Suites |
| License | GPL-2.0-or-later | MIT |
| Language | JavaScript | |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 150 MB | 50 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal | bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | — | ★ 72,092 |
| First released | 2024 | 2025 |
| Replaces | — | Google Slides, Office 365, Prezi |
Why pick each one
Choose AutoBD if…
- Released under the GPL-2.0-or-later license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Tiny footprint — runs in 150 MB RAM
Choose Reveal.js if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Mature project with 72.1k GitHub stars
- Written in JavaScript
Frequently asked questions
Is AutoBD or Reveal.js better?
Neither is universally better. Reveal.js has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are AutoBD and Reveal.js free and open-source?
Yes. AutoBD is licensed under GPL-2.0-or-later and Reveal.js under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run AutoBD and Reveal.js with Docker?
AutoBD: check the project docs for container support. Reveal.js: check the project docs for container support.