SHSelfHostIndex

authentik vs Ingress-NGINX

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted reverse proxy & gateways options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
AU authentik Open-source identity provider with proxy outpost VS IN Ingress-NGINX Kubernetes ingress controller using NGINX
FeatureauthentikIngress-NGINX
CategoryReverse Proxy & GatewaysReverse Proxy & Gateways
LicenseMITApache-2.0
LanguagePythonGo
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM1,024 MB256 MB
Deploymentdocker, kubernetes, helmkubernetes, helm
GitHub stars★ 23,666★ 19,485
First released20202016
ReplacesOkta, Auth0AWS ALB Ingress

Why pick each one

Choose authentik if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Mature project with 23.7k GitHub stars
authentik details

Choose Ingress-NGINX if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Mature project with 19.5k GitHub stars
  • Written in Go
Ingress-NGINX details

Frequently asked questions

Is authentik or Ingress-NGINX better?

Neither is universally better. authentik has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are authentik and Ingress-NGINX free and open-source?

Yes. authentik is licensed under MIT and Ingress-NGINX under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run authentik and Ingress-NGINX with Docker?

authentik: yes. Ingress-NGINX: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons