Astro vs Soupault
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted blogging platforms options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Astro
Modern static site framework for content-driven sites
VS
Soupault
HTML-centric static website generator and processor
| Feature | Astro | Soupault |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Blogging Platforms | Blogging Platforms |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | TypeScript | OCaml |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | binary, source | binary, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 61,631 | ★ 430 |
| First released | 2021 | 2019 |
| Replaces | WordPress, Medium | Jekyll, Hugo |
Why pick each one
Choose Soupault if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Written in OCaml
- Tiny footprint — runs in 64 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Astro or Soupault better?
Neither is universally better. Astro has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Astro and Soupault free and open-source?
Yes. Astro is licensed under MIT and Soupault under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Astro and Soupault with Docker?
Astro: check the project docs for container support. Soupault: check the project docs for container support.