Argo CD vs TeamCity
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted ci/cd & build options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Argo CD
Declarative GitOps continuous delivery for Kubernetes
VS
TeamCity
Powerful CI/CD server from JetBrains
| Feature | Argo CD | TeamCity |
|---|---|---|
| Category | CI/CD & Build | CI/CD & Build |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Proprietary |
| Language | Go | Java |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 1,024 MB | 4,096 MB |
| Deployment | kubernetes, helm | docker, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 23,867 | — |
| First released | 2018 | 2006 |
| Replaces | Spinnaker | Jenkins, CircleCI |
Why pick each one
Choose Argo CD if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
- Mature project with 23.9k GitHub stars
- Written in Go
Choose TeamCity if…
- Released under the Proprietary license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in Java
Frequently asked questions
Is Argo CD or TeamCity better?
Neither is universally better. Argo CD has the larger community, while TeamCity is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Argo CD and TeamCity free and open-source?
Yes. Argo CD is licensed under Apache-2.0 and TeamCity under Proprietary. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Argo CD and TeamCity with Docker?
Argo CD: check the project docs for container support. TeamCity: yes.