ArchiSteamFarm vs MTA:SA

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted game servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureArchiSteamFarmMTA:SA
CategoryGame ServersGame Servers
LicenseApache-2.0GPL-3.0
LanguageC#C++
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM256 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, binarybare-metal
GitHub stars★ 13,601★ 1,822
First released20152023
ReplacesIdle Master

Why pick each one

Choose ArchiSteamFarm if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 13.6k GitHub stars
  • Written in C#
ArchiSteamFarm details

Choose MTA:SA if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • Active community (1.8k GitHub stars)
  • Written in C++
  • Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
MTA:SA details

Frequently asked questions

Is ArchiSteamFarm or MTA:SA better?

Neither is universally better. ArchiSteamFarm has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are ArchiSteamFarm and MTA:SA free and open-source?

Yes. ArchiSteamFarm is licensed under Apache-2.0 and MTA:SA under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run ArchiSteamFarm and MTA:SA with Docker?

ArchiSteamFarm: yes. MTA:SA: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons