Appsmith vs Jobber
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted automation & workflows options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Appsmith
Open-source low-code platform for building internal apps
VS
Jobber
Smarter cron replacement with retries and notifications
| Feature | Appsmith | Jobber |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Automation & Workflows | Automation & Workflows |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Language | TypeScript | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 2,048 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | docker, kubernetes, helm | binary, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 40,605 | ★ 1,417 |
| First released | 2020 | 2015 |
| Replaces | Retool, Microsoft Power Apps | cron |
Why pick each one
Choose Jobber if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Active community (1.4k GitHub stars)
- Written in Go
Frequently asked questions
Is Appsmith or Jobber better?
Neither is universally better. Appsmith has the larger community, while Jobber is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Appsmith and Jobber free and open-source?
Yes. Appsmith is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Jobber under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Appsmith and Jobber with Docker?
Appsmith: yes. Jobber: check the project docs for container support.