Apache Airflow vs Diun
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted automation & workflows options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Apache Airflow
Programmatically author, schedule and monitor workflows
VS
Diun
Notifier that alerts when Docker images receive updates
| Feature | Apache Airflow | Diun |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Automation & Workflows | Automation & Workflows |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Language | Python | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 4,096 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | docker, kubernetes, helm | docker, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 46,409 | ★ 4,828 |
| First released | 2015 | 2019 |
| Replaces | AWS Step Functions, Azure Data Factory | Watchtower |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Apache Airflow or Diun better?
Neither is universally better. Apache Airflow has the larger community, while Diun is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Apache Airflow and Diun free and open-source?
Yes. Apache Airflow is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Diun under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Apache Airflow and Diun with Docker?
Apache Airflow: yes. Diun: yes.