Anubis vs Envoy

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted reverse proxy & gateways options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureAnubisEnvoy
CategoryReverse Proxy & GatewaysReverse Proxy & Gateways
LicenseMITApache-2.0
LanguageGoC++
Setup difficultyEasyHard
Min. RAM64 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, binarydocker, kubernetes, binary
GitHub stars★ 21,230★ 28,735
First released20252016
ReplacesCloudflare Bot ManagementNginx, HAProxy

Why pick each one

Choose Anubis if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 21.2k GitHub stars
Anubis details

Choose Envoy if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Mature project with 28.7k GitHub stars
Envoy details

Frequently asked questions

Is Anubis or Envoy better?

Neither is universally better. Envoy has the larger community, while Anubis is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Anubis and Envoy free and open-source?

Yes. Anubis is licensed under MIT and Envoy under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Anubis and Envoy with Docker?

Anubis: yes. Envoy: yes.

Related comparisons