AnonAddy vs Roundcube
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted mail servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
AnonAddy
Email forwarding service for creating aliases
VS
Roundcube
Browser-based IMAP webmail client
| Feature | AnonAddy | Roundcube |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Mail Servers | Mail Servers |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | PHP | PHP |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | docker | docker, bare-metal, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 4,789 | ★ 7,118 |
| First released | 2026 | 2008 |
| Replaces | — | Gmail, Outlook Web |
Why pick each one
Choose AnonAddy if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (4.8k GitHub stars)
- Written in PHP
Frequently asked questions
Is AnonAddy or Roundcube better?
Roundcube is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider AnonAddy if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are AnonAddy and Roundcube free and open-source?
Yes. AnonAddy is licensed under MIT and Roundcube under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run AnonAddy and Roundcube with Docker?
AnonAddy: yes. Roundcube: yes.