Pinpoint APM vs Coroot
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Pinpoint APM
Application performance management for large-scale systems
VS
Coroot
eBPF-based observability with automatic insights
| Feature | Pinpoint APM | Coroot |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Monitoring & Status | Monitoring & Status |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | Java | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 2,048 MB | 1,024 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | docker, kubernetes, helm |
| GitHub stars | ★ 13,855 | ★ 7,866 |
| First released | 2015 | 2022 |
| Replaces | New Relic, Dynatrace | Datadog, New Relic |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Pinpoint APM or Coroot better?
Neither is universally better. Pinpoint APM has the larger community, while Coroot is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Pinpoint APM and Coroot free and open-source?
Yes. Pinpoint APM is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Coroot under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Pinpoint APM and Coroot with Docker?
Pinpoint APM: yes. Coroot: yes.