Activepieces vs Temporal
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted automation & workflows options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Activepieces
Open-source no-code business automation
VS
Temporal
Durable execution platform for reliable distributed workflows
| Feature | Activepieces | Temporal |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Automation & Workflows | Automation & Workflows |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | TypeScript | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Hard |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 2,048 MB |
| Deployment | docker | docker, kubernetes, helm |
| GitHub stars | ★ 23,620 | ★ 22,173 |
| First released | 2022 | 2019 |
| Replaces | Zapier, Make | AWS Step Functions, Azure Logic Apps |
Why pick each one
Choose Activepieces if…
- Truly open-source license
- Friendly no-code UI
- Active development
Choose Temporal if…
- Extremely reliable for long workflows
- Strong multi-language support
Frequently asked questions
Is Activepieces or Temporal better?
Activepieces is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler medium setup. Consider Temporal if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Activepieces and Temporal free and open-source?
Yes. Activepieces is licensed under MIT and Temporal under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Activepieces and Temporal with Docker?
Activepieces: yes. Temporal: yes.