Activepieces vs Earthly
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Activepieces
Open-source no-code business automation
VS
Earthly
Repeatable, container-based builds for CI
| Feature | Activepieces | Earthly |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Automation & Workflows | CI/CD & Build |
| License | MIT | MPL-2.0 |
| Language | TypeScript | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker | binary, docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 23,620 | ★ 12,049 |
| First released | 2022 | 2020 |
| Replaces | Zapier, Make | Make, GitHub Actions |
Why pick each one
Choose Activepieces if…
- Truly open-source license
- Friendly no-code UI
- Active development
Choose Earthly if…
- Released under the MPL-2.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 12k GitHub stars
- Written in Go
Frequently asked questions
Is Activepieces or Earthly better?
Neither is universally better. Activepieces has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Activepieces and Earthly free and open-source?
Yes. Activepieces is licensed under MIT and Earthly under MPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Activepieces and Earthly with Docker?
Activepieces: yes. Earthly: yes.