Acrylamid vs SPIP
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Acrylamid
Static blog generator with incremental rebuilds
VS
SPIP
CMS with a focus on collaborative edition and multilingualism
| Feature | Acrylamid | SPIP |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Blogging Platforms | Content Management Systems |
| License | BSD-2-Clause | GPL-3.0-or-later |
| Language | Python | |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 64 MB | 50 MB |
| Deployment | source, binary | bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 280 | — |
| First released | 2011 | 2023 |
| Replaces | WordPress, Blogger | Blogger, Coldfusion, Wix |
Why pick each one
Choose Acrylamid if…
- Released under the BSD-2-Clause license
- Written in Python
- Tiny footprint — runs in 64 MB RAM
Choose SPIP if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0-or-later license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Tiny footprint — runs in 50 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Acrylamid or SPIP better?
Neither is universally better. Acrylamid has the larger community, while SPIP is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Acrylamid and SPIP free and open-source?
Yes. Acrylamid is licensed under BSD-2-Clause and SPIP under GPL-3.0-or-later. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Acrylamid and SPIP with Docker?
Acrylamid: check the project docs for container support. SPIP: check the project docs for container support.